History: Professionally produced music recordings
Comparing version 31 with version 40
|
@@ -Lines: 8-11 changed to +Lines: 8-16 @@
* Test and development data (test2 and dev2) of [http://sisec2010.wiki.irisa.fr/tiki-index.php|SiSEC 2010]
* New test data of SiSEC 2013 (test3)
+
+ !! Results + Results for the [http://www.onn.nii.ac.jp/sisec13/evaluation_result/MUS/devMUS2013.htm|development dataset]. + Results for the [http://www.onn.nii.ac.jp/sisec13/evaluation_result/MUS/testMUS2013.htm|test dataset]. +
!! Test Data
__Download [http://www.irisa.fr/metiss/SiSEC10/professional/test1.zip|test1.zip] (7 MB)__ (Test data of [http://sisec2008.wiki.irisa.fr/tiki-index.php?page=Professionally+produced+music+recordings|SiSEC2008] ) @@ -Lines: 75-79 changed to +Lines: 80-84 @@
!! Tasks
The following should be taken in to account:
- * This year, the participants are encouraged to separate either snips or full-length recordings.
+ * The participants are encouraged to separate only the snips of songs in case of test1, test2, dev1, and dev2. In case of test3, the participants are encouraged to separate both snips and full-length recordings.
* Some track names below have the following meaning:
** "vocals" = "a sum of any singing including main vocal, back vocals and singing in the reverb" @@ -Lines: 90-94 changed to +Lines: 95-99 @@
* vocals, drums, bass, other
__~np~test2__nine_inch_nails-the_good_soldier__snip_104_125__mix.wav~/np~__
- * bass, drums, vocals, other
+ * drums, vocals, other
__~np~test2__shannon_hurley-sunrise__snip_62_85__mix.wav~/np~__
* vocals, drums, bass, piano @@ -Lines: 105-136 changed to +Lines: 110-133 @@
* vocals, drums, bass
!! Submission
- Participants may submit separation results for any above-mentioned tracks of any above (test and development) mixtures.
+ Participants may submit separation results for any above-mentioned tracks of the test and development mixtures.
In addition, each participant is asked to provide basic information about his/her algorithm (e.g. a bibliographical reference) and to declare its average running time, expressed in seconds per test excerpt and per GHz of CPU.
!!!How to submit Each participant should make his results available online in the form of a tarball called <YourName>_<dataset>.zip.
-
The included files must be named as follows:
<dataset>__<author>-<song>__<snip or full_mix>__<trackname>.wav
- where <dataset> is one of the test/test2/dev2, <filename> is a shortcut for the set of source signals, <trackname> is the name of the extracted track.
Each participant should then send an email to "zbynek.koldovsky (at) tul.cz" and "onono (at) nii.ac.jp" providing:
+ where <dataset> is one of the test/test2/dev2, <filename> is a shortcut for the set of source signals, <trackname> is the name of the extracted track. For example, the estimated vocal track for the task file "test2_glen_philips-the_spirit_of_shackleton_snip_163_185_mix.wav" should be named as "test2__glen_philips-the_spirit_of_shackleton__snip_163_185__vocals.wav".
- **contact information (name, affiliation)
**basic information about his/her algorithm, including its average running time (in seconds per test excerpt and per GHz of CPU) and a bibliographical reference if possible **the URL of the tarball(s)
+ Each participant should then send an email to "zbynek.koldovsky (at) tul.cz" and to "onono (at) nii.ac.jp" providing:
*contact information (name, affiliation) *basic information about his/her algorithm, including its average running time (in seconds per test excerpt and per GHz of CPU) and a bibliographical reference if possible *the URL of the tarball(s) The submitted audio files will be made available on a website under the terms of the same license as indicated in the section Licenses above. In other words, any modified version inherit exactly the same license as the original. !! Evaluation criteria
- The same basic evaluation criteria as for the [./tiki-index.php?page=Underdetermined-+speech+and+music+mixtures|under-determined speech and music mixtures dataset] will be used first so that results are comparable. More precisely, the estimated stereo source signals will be evaluated via the criteria used for the [http://www.irisa.fr/metiss/SASSEC07/?show=criteria|Stereo Audio Source Separation Evaluation Campaign], except that the order of the sources is fixed. These criteria distinguish spatial (or filtering) distortion, interference and artifacts.
* Associated matlab code: [http://sisec2008.wiki.irisa.fr/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=17|bss_eval_images_nosort.m] Additional evaluation will be provided through the perceptual evaluation toolkit [http://bass-db.gforge.inria.fr/peass/|PEASS].
+ The evaluation will be done through the perceptual evaluation toolkit [http://bass-db.gforge.inria.fr/peass/|PEASS v.2.0].
!! Potential participants
- * MarC Nxx yz
+ * M. Nxx
* Vasileios Pantazis
* Alexey Ozerov (alexey.ozerov (a) irisa_fr) @@ -Lines: 146-148 changed to +Lines: 143-144 @@
[./tiki-index.php?page=Audio+source+separation|Back to Audio source separation top]
-
|